Poker Intellectual Component – Similar advantages can also be achieved in poker. For positional advantage in poker, we may refer to factors such as your position with your opponent, availability of a diverse membership and number of opponents entering the tournament, your aggression, opponent’s stack size, and so on. Of all the poker arts the most important is the creation and realization of positional advantage. Here it is equally important with chess.
Poker Intellectual Component
The conclusion is that intellectual analytic endeavor exists in both chess and poker but the two are dissimilar because positional advantages are dissimilar in quality.
The third type of intellectual activity is related to the analysis of parts of the game situation that are not related to the game system itself. This genre also takes into account the psychological peculiarities of dueling. Data Sgp
Actually, this psychological element is not widely used in chess, especially since the game information is completely open to both opponents.
In poker, the psychological element is really important. This adds almost 1/2 of the player’s success. The type of information that is limited in poker causes players to only conclude it and that can be done simply by observing your opponents. And here you find a great opportunity to add misinformation or manipulate him or create psychological pressure on him, etc. We can describe at least three aspects of the psychological element that experienced players often use.
First, it is observing the opponent’s “sign” and the “singing” you send him. Second, one uses a consistent assessment of the opponent’s psychological situation. Third, one can cause psychological pressure on the opponent to impose his will on him. Data Bullseye
To summarize the next thing above we can explain that the next two games are intellectual battles but their profiles are different. Of the three components of intellectual effort – logical, analytical, and psychological, the most important in chess are the first two while in poker the latter two. However, the analytical component dominates the two games, which is understandable because these two games are intellectual in nature.
And finally there is the last comparative observation. In chess, the role played by psychology, is much more necessary than the role of logic and analytics. Chess in this sense appears as a game of the spirit. Regardless of the situation the player thinks must and can find a way to victory, in this way it does not depend on human feelings and emotions. Chess is a philosophy, an aristocratic game of the soul.
In poker the role of psychology is more important, especially when compared to logic. The moral state of the opponents, their feelings and emotions not only affects the course of the game but also changes the path to victory. In this sense poker is a plebeian game, a battle of human passions.
Philosopher and plebeian, we are all human. Besides, in our lives we take turns being this and that. Both games are beautiful, both deserve your attention provided your intelligence must be checked in equal combat, in other words, provided you are human.